Skip to main content

Code of Conduct

Standard​

Participants should keep SESM review technical, specific, and respectful.

Good review:

  • names concrete risks;
  • cites files, examples, or validator behavior;
  • distinguishes safety concerns from style preferences;
  • proposes wording or fixture improvements when possible;
  • assumes good faith while still treating security and privacy issues seriously.

Unacceptable Conduct​

Unacceptable conduct includes:

  • harassment or personal attacks;
  • publishing private information;
  • pressuring maintainers to include unsafe behavior;
  • intentionally submitting malicious SVGs outside a clearly marked security report;
  • using SESM examples to smuggle credentials, tracking identifiers, or agent instructions.

Reporting​

Report conduct issues to the current maintainer listed in SESM.manifest.toml.

Security issues should follow the Security Policy.